Taxation of Electronic Commerce |
MJM Law Review Articles
|
U.S. State Developments
- Arkansaw and Minnesota attack entity-isolation strategy by taxing e-commence affliliates of in-state businesses. WSJ, Sept. 17, 2002. For Arkansaw legislation, click here. For Minnesota legislation, click here.
- An out-of-state online retailer (Barnes & Noble) was obligated to collect California use tax on sales to California customers because its brick-and-mortar affiliate with in-state stores acted as the online retailer's authorized representative in distributing its coupons, which was selling activity under state law according to the California State Board of Equalization (SBE). Click here for a copy of the opinion. For an attack on the opinion, follow this link (The commentator believed that distributing coupons for BN.com is not a "selling" activity under California law.)
- Article on spinning off an Internet affiliate, showing business need for integration of brick and click businesses, WSJ, March 29, 2000.
- Loophole Heaven --- Internet Commission, Wash. Post, March 29, 2000.
|
| |
OECD Iniative
|
|
E-Commerce in Canada
- Canadian government GST/HST Technical Information Bulletin explaining how e-commerce is to be taxed under the Canadian Goods and Services Tax (July 2002).
- Globe and Mail article: "E-commerce tax policy penalizes Canadian business"
(Sept. 5, 2002).
|
E-Commerce in Europe
|
So-Called Tax Internet Freedom Act
|
US National Politics
|
| |
|
|